https://www.wnd.com/2025/11/safest-option-woman-what-7-eleven-incident-shows/
I say you allow the female clerks to use guns but not the male clerks. Reasoning being that male clerks at 7-Elevens tend to be very self-righteous and condescending towards customers.
so they're going to see every customer as a scumbag and they're going to be too quick to use that gun, whereas females usually are a little more kind towards customers . Needless to say I avoid 7-Elevens like the plague just because they treat customers so poorly usually.
"Teach me thy way, O Lord & lead me in a plain path." — Psalm 27:11
AI GENERATED
Summary of the Article
The article describes how 25-year-old Stephanie Dilyard was fired from her Oklahoma City 7-Eleven after she used her firearm to stop an attacker who threatened to kill her. She says the man told her he would slice her head off, threw items at her, chased her behind the counter, grabbed her by the neck, and continued assaulting her as she tried to escape and call the police.
At that moment she drew her gun and shot him. She survived but suffered neck and hand injuries. The attacker, Kenneth Thompson, had an outstanding felony warrant and now faces charges including assault and battery, violent threats, and attempting to use counterfeit money.
Despite working the dangerous overnight shift alone for more than two years, company policy required her to use only "store items" for self-defense. She said she chose her life because her children depend on her.
The article shifts to analysis by John Lott, who argues that many companies misunderstand crime data when they instruct employees to remain passive during an attack. While raw statistics may suggest passive behavior is slightly safer than "active resistance," the category of resistance includes many unsafe methods that skew the data. Lott states that for women, fighting physically is the most dangerous option, since it often leads to escalated violence by a stronger male attacker.
Running is also risky because many women cannot outrun a male aggressor, and being tackled can cause severe injury. Using improvised weapons like bats or knives doesn't improve the odds much because physical contact still favors the attacker.
Lott argues that a firearm provides the greatest increase in a woman's ability to protect herself. According to his interpretation of Bureau of Justice Statistics data, women using passive behavior are 2.5 times more likely to be seriously injured than women who use a gun. He also claims that when women receive concealed-carry permits, female murder rates drop significantly and rape rates fall by roughly 25% in states that allow nondiscretionary concealed carry.
The article concludes that while police are essential, they almost always arrive after the crime has already occurred, meaning immediate survival rests on the victim. The final note is that Stephanie's children still have their mother because she defended herself.
Critique
The article is compelling and emotionally powerful, successfully blending a personal story with a policy argument. It highlights the real danger of overnight retail work and the tension between corporate safety rules and individual survival.
However, it presents only one research viewpoint, relying heavily on John Lott's work, which is respected by some but disputed by others. The article does not explore alternative perspectives, such as why corporations create no-resistance rules, how liability plays into policy, or whether different safety protocols could protect workers without requiring them to be armed.
Additionally, the argument presents a binary choice—passive compliance or firearm defense—while ignoring other solutions like improving store security, mandating two-person shifts, installing protective barriers, or employing on-site security staff.
It also does not address potential legal or employment consequences for workers who carry guns against company policy. Still, its primary strength is that it raises an urgent question about what individuals, especially women, can realistically do when physically overpowered and alone.
